Sunday 20 April 2008

Birkenhead docks: regeneration or ruin?


The City of Liverpool and its people have faced and over come their fair share of problems and disasters in their time. From Hillsborough to the Mersey air raids of World War II, it seems nothing can defeat this city. Disaster after disaster, its Liverpool’s spirit that never gets broken-shining through adversity.

Recent plans to build an ‘eco-town’ on the disused land around Birkenhead docks were scrapped, but it’s little wonder that this damning revelation has made supporters of this venture more determined than ever to continue. Regeneration plans for the area are merely on hold, with Wirral Council confident they will receive financial backing through a new governmental scheme.

Birkenhead Docks are one of Merseyside’s most famous landmarks and are widely celebrated for the industry they brought to Merseyside and history that surrounds them. Since the first brick was laid in 1844 by Sir Philip Edgerton, the docks have lead a long and turbulent existence; a perfect example of this city’s ability to bounce back and never be defeated.

The first two docks on the estate, Morpeth and Egreton, were opened in 1847 but further construction of the site was halted after a severe depression hit the Birkenhead itself. This lead to a mass of residents leaving the area for more affluent parts of the city and the site was transferred to a more suitable location, deemed the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board.

Things began to look up for the docks as a whole when in 1851 the ‘Great Float’ opened, split into ‘East’ and ‘West’, with four miles of quays which lead to increased trading and business. It was from these floats that many emigrants left for Australia in the 1850’s.

With business booming, the Alfred Dock, pictured to the left, was opened in 1866 which increased access to the ‘Great Float’ and helped meet the increased demand for grain from growing North-West industrial towns. Corn warehouses and animal holding pens were also built to suit the growing sheep and cattle trade and due to huge animal deliveries from the America’s arriving on fast steam ships. A network of railway lines was also set up around the dock area, bringing coal from Wales for the ships.

All this was about to change, as hoards of Britain’s sheep and cattle were affected by a sickness, which restricted the importation of the animals and made transport of them illegal, unless they were quarantined or slaughtered. The docks over-came yet another obstacle, building slaughter-houses and meat stores on the two original docks of Morpeth and Egreton.

Over the next twenty years, many set-backs befell Birkenhead docks, but they merely found alternative ways to continue and even increase trading. Birkenhead lost one of its vital links with the Welsh coal industry in the 1880’s, when a separate railway network and docks were built in Wales.

Birkenhead merely found alternative and more contemporary means of trade, adapting to accommodate the growing oil and petrol industry and provided storage tanks and pipes for feeding the supplies directly onto the ships

In 1894, the building of the Manchester Ship Canal was completed. This new waterway was specifically constructed to isolate the docks at Liverpool and aimed to avert trade from the Birkenhead docks. Incredibly, this resulted in a huge increase in trade, with 40-50% of all Britain’s imported animal trade passing through Birkenhead.

The Miners Strike in the 1920’s also lead to increased importation through the port, Bidston dock opens off ‘West Float’ and Birkenhead docks reached its height of activity in 1939, claiming 13% of Liverpool’s trade.

Trade only began to fall during the 1960’s, with importers turning into competitors, European ports taking business from Birkenhead, until most of the docks were dubbed out of use by the 1970’s.

Currently, only the east end of the former ‘Great Float’ is used, transporting goods between Merseyside and Ireland. Two of the docks have been filled in and the Morpeth and Egerton quaysides have been transformed into offices and museums.

Birkenhead docks have fought back when times were hard, adapting well to change in order to survive, but there is one last obstacle to over-come and a decision to be made. For Birkenhead docks, is it regeneration or ruin?

[photos courtesy of harrymoon and Maddie Digital through Flickr]

Merseyside loses eco-town bid

Liverpool has missed out on becoming one of Britain’s new ‘eco-towns’.

The Birkenhead Docks was one of the 46 sites to be considered for Britain’s first eco-friendly towns, set to be: “low-energy, carbon-neutral developments built from recycled materials.”

The proposed eco-friendly development planned to regenerate the area and would have seen 10,000 new houses, shops, leisure areas and sky scrapers, all built on derelict land.

The Government this week released a short-list of the 15 suitable eco-town sites around the country, which will be reduced to ten after consideration. Birkenhead’s application was rejected.

Sites in Norfolk, Essex, Leeds, Cornwall, Leicestershire, South Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire and Nottinghamshire are amongst the areas short-listed for the scheme.

The 15 short-listed 'eco-town' sites:

View Larger Map

These developments are part of the Governments plans to build 3million homes by 2020 to create a "home-owning, asset-owning, wealth-owning democracy," according to Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

They will aim for a reduced reliance on cars with shops and schools within a 10 minute walk and each town centre will be pedestrianised, with an imposed 15mph limit on all roads.

Living and working in Lincolnshire, 20 year old Christopher Youds is in favour of the proposed development in his area, stating:
“Eco-towns are the future, as it is becoming harder and harder to ignore the impending effects global warming will have on the environment and the impact it could have on our day-to-day lives.”

These eco-developments will be the first towns built since the 1960’s, when 21 new towns were constructed. Skelmersdale, Warrington Newtown and an area in Central Lancashire were among the new towns created in the North-West designed to tackle poor living conditions, rising birth rate and a rapidly increasing population.

The creation of these environmentally friendly towns has proved controversial and local councils have faced strong opposition from local residents, as many of the towns are set to be built on green fields.

Wirral Council are confident they will receive Government backing to continue their regeneration plans for the area, with Jim Wilkie of Wirral Council stating:

“While the council is disappointed not to be granted eco town status, we are confident. The majority of the short-listed eco towns will provide new free-standing communities, unlike Wirral’s proposals which aim to regenerate the very heart of the borough.”

Tuesday 4 March 2008

Calling time on 24-hour drinking?

Photobucket
The controversial 24-hour drinking ruling has been declared a "partial success" by Labour, the Daily Mail published yesterday.

Ministers say the consequences of this change in the law have not been "dramatic", but they chose not mention the 25% rise in violent crime between 3am and 6am and instead focussed on the mere 3% fall in alcohol related offences.
The claims are due to be published today in a report from the Home Office, which will discuss some minor changes to the act. There will be a call for a stricter clampdown on drinking, with premises serving under-age drinkers on more than one occasion being shut down.

Labour have been directly criticised for this declaration of success by the Conservative party. Shadow Home Secretary David Davis accused Gordon Brown of being "in denial" and that the evidence against the 24-hour drinking was "overwhelming".

The Daily Mail's negative attitude towards the suggestion that the introduction of the 24 hour drinking law was even a little bit successful seems to reflect the opinion shared by many. Have our drinking habits, or 'drinking culture'- actually changed at all? 'Binge Drinking' is still rife and the idealistic pipe dream of a 'Continental Cafe-Culture', dreamed up by politicians did not materialise either-surprisingly.
This relaxed culture of drinking in cafe bars until the early hours in countries like Spain, Italy and the on the rest of the continent is often associated with 24-hour drinking, causing many people to believe these laws are in force there. This lifestyle is in fact regulated, with pubs closing at 4:30am at the latest, although many still choose to close at 1am. The weather must also play a part in European bar culture, as I am sure it would be less appealing if it were pouring down with rain.

Contrary to this majority opinion, in response to 'Have the 24-hour drinking laws worked?' by Stephen Addison of Reuters, Karma replies:

The idea that 30 months is a sufficient amount of time to detect a change in the ingrained drinking patterns of the English is ridiculous. It’ll take at least 5 years to even see any significant changes, and probably 10 years before any firm conclusions can be made.

Addison doubts that our drinking habits are likely to change, 30 months on from the act being introduced, pointing out:

Critics look around the heaving city-centre streets on a Friday night and say the new regime has done little or nothing to encourage the Continental-style cafe culture. Booze-related crime, they say, has not gone away: it merely takes place later at night now.


Journalist David Olser is evidently pro 24-hour drinking, preferring to blame our 'yobbish' culture for the rise in violent crime:

Labour’s 2005 decision to bring order to this confused situation and put de facto 24-hour drinking above board was clearly the right one, even though the impact is still being debated.

If loutish behaviour has become a problem in some places, that is an enforcement issue; this time the government should ignore the Daily Mail editorials – difficult as that is for them – and allow grown ups to decide when they want a drink.

24-hour drinking will continue to be a very debateable topic, but it seems we need more police enforcement to control the situation. Before it was introduced, drinkers left pubs between 11pm and 11:30pm and if violence broke out it would usually be around this time. More police officers were on duty around these times to handle the influx of drinkers and increased risk of drunk and disorderly behaviour, but now pub closing times are more varied and wide-spread.

Liberal Democrat Mayoral candidate for London, Brian Paddick, agrees that the decision has not been enforced properly, blaming lack of funding:

The Government’s approach to licensing laws is topsy turvy. Labour has loosened the rules on 24-hour drinking but not stumped up the cash to ensure the changes are properly enforced.


Saturday 23 February 2008

Sight campaign Veteran "forgotten" by Government

A World War II veteran rapidly losing his sight is selling his house to afford his treatment as his condition is not advanced enough to be treated on the NHS.

88 year old Jack Tagg from Torquay suffers from age-related macular degeneration, or AMD, and has put his house on the market to raise the cash for the treatment he needs after being refused care from the NHS. Mr Tagg was told that unless he has lost his vision in his left eye; he could not receive the vital injections of the drug Lucentis which could reverse the process and restore his sight, as guidelines currently suggest only suffers with advanced AMD should be treated, "calculated cruelty"according to Tagg.

Age-related macular degeneration is the most common case of blindness in the UK, according to the BBC, so couldn't prevention be better than cure and shouldn't the treatment be available for all sufferers; regardless of the stage the condition is at?

The large amount of media focus surrounding this story has drawn attention to Mr Tagg's plight and has resulted in cheques from the public flooding in to pay the £10,000 for the injections he needs, whilst strangely other areas in the South-West of England offer this treatment for free. Mr Tagg's GP Dr Martin Rankin has accused the government of "forgetting" the World War II pilot and they have both descended on Downing Street this week, targeting PM Gordon Brown himself.

Dr Rankin appealed directly to the Prime Minister about the situation and was quoted as saying:
"When Hitler decided he wanted to run Britain, like thousands of other brave men and women of his generation, Jack joined the RAF. It seems to me that what Jack did for us has now been forgotten by your government.

"We would ask that you pay the cheques we have handed to your staff in to your personal account and then forward a cheque onto Mr Jack Tagg. We hope that being humiliated in this way will force you to sort out the problem, not just for Jack, but for everyone else in his wretched position."

Mr Tagg said of the campaign:

"We shall continue until they agree this simple and economic measure, because if you let people go blind they need more care."

Sunday 3 February 2008

LA Launches Marijuana Machines

Marijuana can now be bought from vending machines on the streets of California, the BBC reported this week.

Providing users have a prescription, the drug can now be obtained for health reasons from special machines. These machines, protected by a security guard, require specific checks: a special card, fingerprinting, eye scans and a verifying photograph before allowing patients use of the machine.

The Future?

Operators believe this to be a break through and have a vision of a future where prescription drug vending machines are common place.

Marijuana is used medicinally to mainly relieve pain and stimulate appetite and according to a survey by the International Journal of Clinical Practice, 70% of patients in the UK said:

"cannabis significantly relieved their symptoms."-BBC

Eleven US states controversially identify the use of marijuana for health reasons, whilst the US Government continues to ignore the medicinal benefits of Marijuana, being banned by the 1970 Controlled substances act.